Comparison

Frikadellen vs Bio-Hamburger vom Rind

Overall, Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrikadellenBio-Hamburger vom Rind
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 310 kcal 248 kcal
Fat 23 g 18 g
Saturated fat 8.4 g 8.2 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0.1 g
Protein 13 g 19 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has 20% fewer calories (248 kcal vs 310 kcal).
  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has 22% less fat (18 g vs 23 g).
  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has no sugar, while Frikadellen has 0.4 g.
  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has 19% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Frikadellen has 84% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has 32% more protein (19 g vs 13 g).
  • Bio-Hamburger vom Rind is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Frikadellen lists: Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Frikadellen

Schweinefleisch 80% (z.T. fein zerkleinert), Paniermehl (Weizenmehl; Speisesalz, Hefe), Zwiebeln, Wasser, Speisesalz, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Senf (Wasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze), Dextrose, Kräuter, Rapsöl.

Bio-Hamburger vom Rind

98 % Rindfleisch (z. T. fein zerkleinert), Speisesalz, Pfeffer schwarz, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure. Kann Spuren von Laktose, Sellerie und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Frikadellen or Bio-Hamburger vom Rind?

Overall, Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Hamburger vom Rind has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons