Comparison
Fresas vs Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefroren
Overall, Fresas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fresas | Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 25 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fresas has 48% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 48 kcal).
- Fresas has no fat, while Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefroren has 0.5 g.
- Fresas has 47% less sugar (4.1 g vs 7.8 g).
- Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefroren has 54% more fiber (4.1 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Fresas
Fresas enteras 100%.
Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefroren
Himbeeren, Brombeeren, Erdbeeren, Johannisbeeren rot, Kulturheidelbeeren.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fresas or Bio-Beerenmischung, tiefgefroren?
Overall, Fresas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fresas has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fresas has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.