Comparison
Fragola essiccata vs Uva Sultanina
Overall, Fragola essiccata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fragola essiccata | Uva Sultanina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 280 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 25.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 43.8 g | 11.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 18.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Uva Sultanina has 16% fewer calories (280 kcal vs 333 kcal).
- Fragola essiccata has no fat, while Uva Sultanina has 25.1 g.
- Uva Sultanina has 73% less sugar (11.6 g vs 43.8 g).
- Fragola essiccata has no salt, while Uva Sultanina has 0.8 g.
- Fragola essiccata has 96% more fiber (18.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Fragola essiccata has 90% more protein (6.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Fragola essiccata is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fragola essiccata
Fragola 100%
Uva Sultanina
UVA, OLIO DI GIRASOLE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fragola essiccata or Uva Sultanina?
Overall, Fragola essiccata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Uva Sultanina has fewer calories: 280 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uva Sultanina has less sugar: 11.6 g versus 43.8 g per 100 g.