Comparison
Fragola essiccata vs Noberasco
Overall, Fragola essiccata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fragola essiccata | Noberasco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 311 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 43.8 g | 72 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 18.1 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fragola essiccata has no fat, while Noberasco has 0.6 g.
- Fragola essiccata has 39% less sugar (43.8 g vs 72 g).
- Fragola essiccata has 71% more fiber (18.1 g vs 5.2 g).
- Fragola essiccata has 69% more protein (6.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Fragola essiccata has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fragola essiccata is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fragola essiccata
Fragola 100%
Noberasco
uva sultanina,olio di semi di cotone
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fragola essiccata or Noberasco?
Overall, Fragola essiccata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Noberasco has fewer calories: 311 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fragola essiccata has less sugar: 43.8 g versus 72 g per 100 g.