Comparison
Uva Sultanina vs Noberasco
Overall, Noberasco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Uva Sultanina | Noberasco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 280 kcal | 311 kcal |
| Fat | 25.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.6 g | 72 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Noberasco has 98% less fat (0.6 g vs 25.1 g).
- Noberasco has no saturated fat, while Uva Sultanina has 2.8 g.
- Uva Sultanina has 84% less sugar (11.6 g vs 72 g).
- Noberasco has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Noberasco has 87% more fiber (5.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Noberasco has 68% more protein (1.9 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Uva Sultanina
UVA, OLIO DI GIRASOLE
Noberasco
uva sultanina,olio di semi di cotone
FAQ
Which is healthier: Uva Sultanina or Noberasco?
Overall, Noberasco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Uva Sultanina has fewer calories: 280 kcal versus 311 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uva Sultanina has less sugar: 11.6 g versus 72 g per 100 g.