Formula 2 vs Hydration tablets
Overall, Hydration tablets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Formula 2 | Hydration tablets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 92 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 9.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hydration tablets has 85% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Hydration tablets has 86% less sugar (12.8 g vs 92 g).
- Formula 2 has 98% less salt (0.2 g vs 9.2 g).
Ingredients
Formula 2
Not available.
Hydration tablets
glucose (sugar), sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, malic acid, salts (potassium chloride, sodium chloride), ascorbic acid, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, natural orange flavour, beetroot powder (colouring agent), sucralose (sweetener), calcium-d-pantothenate, niacinamide, cyanocobalamin, beta-carotene, riboflavin 5-phosphate, thiamine mononitrate, dl-alpha-tocopheryl acetate, zinc oxide, copper gluconate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, manganese sulphate, folic acid, biotin. carbohyd (sugars) salt amount per tablet (% nrv* per dose (2 tablets)). chloride 185mg (47%), magnesium 28mg (1596), calcium 60mg (15%), zinc 2mg (40%). manganese 0.5mg (50%). copper 250g 50g d protein
FAQ
Which is healthier: Formula 2 or Hydration tablets?
Overall, Hydration tablets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hydration tablets has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hydration tablets has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 92 g per 100 g.