Comparison
Fontal Käse vs Fontal
Overall, Fontal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fontal Käse | Fontal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 369 kcal | 391 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fontal Käse has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Fontal has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Fontal has 50% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Fontal has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fontal Käse
Not available.
Fontal
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fontal Käse or Fontal?
Overall, Fontal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fontal Käse has fewer calories: 369 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fontal has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.