Fondue Recette Savoyarde vs Fondue aux trois fromages
Overall, Fondue aux trois fromages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Fondue Recette Savoyarde
Fondue aux trois fromages
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fondue Recette Savoyarde | Fondue aux trois fromages |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fondue aux trois fromages has 11% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 242 kcal).
- Fondue aux trois fromages has 17% less fat (15 g vs 18 g).
- Fondue aux trois fromages has no sugar, while Fondue Recette Savoyarde has 0.5 g.
- Fondue Recette Savoyarde is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fondue aux trois fromages lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Fondue Recette Savoyarde
Fromages 46% (Emmental 36%, Comte 7%, Tomme 3%), eau, vin blanc (18%), crème', amidon de maïs, sel, correcteur d'acidité: E339, ail, Kirsch.
Fondue aux trois fromages
Fromages : Emmental (45%) (LAIT), Comté 6% (LAIT), Tomme (3%) (LAIT), eau, vin blanc (SULFITES), amidon modifié de mais, sels de fonte : E331, E339 ,sel, kirsch, ail, poivre blanc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fondue Recette Savoyarde or Fondue aux trois fromages?
Overall, Fondue aux trois fromages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fondue aux trois fromages has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fondue aux trois fromages has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.