Fonds d'artichauts vs Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado
Overall, Fonds d'artichauts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fonds d'artichauts | Corazones de Alcachofas - Ha... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 119 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fonds d'artichauts has 76% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Fonds d'artichauts has no fat, while Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado has 9.3 g.
- Fonds d'artichauts has no saturated fat, while Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado has 1.2 g.
- Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado has 16% more fiber (2.4 g vs 2 g).
- Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado has 26% more protein (2.7 g vs 2 g).
- Fonds d'artichauts has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fonds d'artichauts
Fonds d'artichauts, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique.
Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado
Alcachofa, aceite de girasol (21%), aceite de oliva (0,77%), sal, acidulante: ácido cítrico y antioxidante: ácido ascórbico. Producto de Perú. Modo de empleo: Perforar la tapa y calentar 2 min. a 800W. Listo para consumir. Conservar a temperatura ambiente.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fonds d'artichauts or Corazones de Alcachofas - Hacendado?
Overall, Fonds d'artichauts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fonds d'artichauts has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fonds d'artichauts has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.