Comparison

Fondants noir intense happy go vs Croquants de sésame au chocolat

Overall, Croquants de sésame au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFondants noir intense happy...Croquants de sésame au choco...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 487 kcal 498 kcal
Fat 34.3 g 37 g
Saturated fat 13.3 g 0 g
Sugars 31.8 g 29 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 2 g
Protein 5 g 14.5 g
Additives10
AllergensEggsSesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croquants de sésame au chocolat has no saturated fat, while Fondants noir intense happy go has 13.3 g.
  • Croquants de sésame au chocolat has 66% more protein (14.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Croquants de sésame au chocolat has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Fondants noir intense happy go lists: Eggs.
  • Only Croquants de sésame au chocolat lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Fondants noir intense happy go

Chocolat noir* 66% Equitable sans lécithine 25% (masse de cacao*, sucre de extrait de vanille, beurre de cacao* *), Sucre de canne Ecosocial*, blanc d'œuf*, huile de tournesol*, noix de coco*, farine de riz*, purée de pomme*, eau, farine de guar*, sel de Guérande.

Croquants de sésame au chocolat

65% graines de sésame*, 9% miel*, sucre de canne*, glucose*, chocolat noir d’Équateur* & vanille* (*produits issus de l’agriculture biologique) / Sans additif

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fondants noir intense happy go or Croquants de sésame au chocolat?

Overall, Croquants de sésame au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fondants noir intense happy go has fewer calories: 487 kcal versus 498 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croquants de sésame au chocolat has less sugar: 29 g versus 31.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons