Comparison

Fondant au chocolat vs Fondant au chocolat Selection CRF

Overall, Fondant au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFondant au chocolatFondant au chocolat Selectio...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 414 kcal 422 kcal
Fat 24 g 26 g
Saturated fat 16 g 15 g
Sugars 32 g 40 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.2 g 2.3 g
Protein 6.4 g 6.3 g
Additives03
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fondant au chocolat has 20% less sugar (32 g vs 40 g).
  • Fondant au chocolat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fondant au chocolat Selection CRF lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Fondant au chocolat

Sucre* 30%, _œufs_ issus de poules élevées en plein air* (liquide, pasteurisé) 29%, _beurre_* (_lait_) 17%, chocolat noir 12% (pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao), farine de _blé*_ (_gluten_) 7,9%, cacao maigre en poudre, eau*. * Ingrédient d'origine française

Fondant au chocolat Selection CRF

OEUF, sucre, chocolat noir 70% de cacao (19%) (pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithines de SOJA), beurre (LAIT), farine de BLE enrichie [avec carbonate de calcium, acide folique, fer, niacine, thiamine], huile de palme, huile de colza, sirop de glucose, conservateur (sorbate de potassium). Peut contenir des fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fondant au chocolat or Fondant au chocolat Selection CRF?

Overall, Fondant au chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fondant au chocolat has fewer calories: 414 kcal versus 422 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fondant au chocolat has less sugar: 32 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons