Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE vs Nata
Overall, Nata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE | Nata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 12.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata has 35% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 293 kcal).
- Nata has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- Nata has 42% less saturated fat (12.2 g vs 21 g).
- Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE has 19% less sugar (3 g vs 3.7 g).
Ingredients
Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE
Crème de _lait_, stabilisants : carraghénanes, lactase. Elaborée à partir de lait origine France.
Nata
Nata ligera de la leche, almidon natural y proteinas de la leche,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE or Nata?
Overall, Nata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fluide 30% Mat. Gr. ENTIÈRE has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.