Comparison

Flips Cacahuète vs Lay's 3D's Bugles goût cacahuète

Overall, Flips Cacahuète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlips CacahuèteLay's 3D's Bugles goût cacah...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 475 kcal 570 kcal
Fat 22.4 g 38 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 4 g
Sugars 2 g 4 g
Salt 2 g 1.8 g
Fiber 5.1 g 3 g
Protein 14.2 g 8.5 g
Additives02
AllergensGluten, PeanutsGluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flips Cacahuète has 17% fewer calories (475 kcal vs 570 kcal).
  • Flips Cacahuète has 41% less fat (22.4 g vs 38 g).
  • Flips Cacahuète has 28% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 4 g).
  • Flips Cacahuète has 50% less sugar (2 g vs 4 g).
  • Flips Cacahuète has 41% more fiber (5.1 g vs 3 g).
  • Flips Cacahuète has 40% more protein (14.2 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Flips Cacahuète has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lay's 3D's Bugles goût cacahuète lists: Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Flips Cacahuète

60% semoule de maïs, 33% cacahuètes moulues (arachides), huiles végétales en proportion variable (tournesol, colza), sel marin, arôme naturel de poivre

Lay's 3D's Bugles goût cacahuète

Farine de maïs,huile de tournesol ,CACAHUÈTES (10%),base aromatisante cacahuète [arômes (contiennent ORGE, BLÉ, NOISETTE, LAIT), farine de BLÉ, exhausteur de goût (glutamate monosodique), poudre de cacao, colorant (extrait de paprika)],sucre,sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flips Cacahuète or Lay's 3D's Bugles goût cacahuète?

Overall, Flips Cacahuète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flips Cacahuète has fewer calories: 475 kcal versus 570 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flips Cacahuète has less sugar: 2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons