Comparison
Fisch vs Fish Snack
Overall, Fish Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fisch | Fish Snack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 277 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 12.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 40.7 g | 16.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fish Snack has 71% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 277 kcal).
- Fish Snack has 88% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Fish Snack has 68% less sugar (2.2 g vs 6.8 g).
- Fish Snack has 87% less salt (1.6 g vs 12.5 g).
- Fisch has 59% more protein (40.7 g vs 16.6 g).
- Fish Snack has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fisch
Not available.
Fish Snack
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fisch or Fish Snack?
Overall, Fish Snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fish Snack has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fish Snack has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.