Filets de harengs fumés au bois de hêtre vs Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne
Overall, Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de harengs fumés au bois de hêtre
Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de harengs fumés au b... | Filets de harengs doux fumes... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 189 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has 10% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 189 kcal).
- Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has 15% less fat (11 g vs 13 g).
- Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has 32% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 4 g).
- Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has no sugar, while Filets de harengs fumés au bois de hêtre has 0.3 g.
Ingredients
Filets de harengs fumés au bois de hêtre
Hareng (_poisson_) fumé (hareng 96,4% Clupea Harengus, pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est, sel).
Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne
Filets de hareng (clupea harengus) 96%, sel 4%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de harengs fumés au bois de hêtre or Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne?
Overall, Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de harengs doux fumes à l ancienne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.