Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet vs Dropfruit Smakkers
Overall, Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet | Dropfruit Smakkers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 47 g | 53 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dropfruit Smakkers has 82% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has 11% less sugar (47 g vs 53 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has 100% more fiber (5.8 g vs 0 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet
Syrup/Syrup. molasses/molasses, wheat flour wheat flour wheat flour, oat bran oat bran, licorice - extract/licorice extract/licorice extract (3%), carbomedicinalis (vegetable charcoal), anise oil/anise oil/anise oil.
Dropfruit Smakkers
Glucosestroop, suiker, zetmeel, gelatine, rietsuikermelasse, salmiakzout, zoethoutwortelextract, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma's, glansmiddel (carnaubawas), kleurstoffen (karmijn, plantaardige koolstof, curcumine).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet or Dropfruit Smakkers?
Overall, Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has less sugar: 47 g versus 53 g per 100 g.