Comparison

Fettine sottilissime tacchino vs Salam ardelenesc

Overall, Fettine sottilissime tacchino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFettine sottilissime tacchin...Salam ardelenesc
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 106 kcal 466 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 43 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 16 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 3.7 g
Fiber 0 g 1.5 g
Protein 24 g 18 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has 77% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 466 kcal).
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has 97% less fat (1.1 g vs 43 g).
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has 98% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 16 g).
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has no sugar, while Salam ardelenesc has 0.5 g.
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has 96% less salt (0.2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Salam ardelenesc has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has 25% more protein (24 g vs 18 g).
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Fettine sottilissime tacchino is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Fettine sottilissime tacchino

Tacchino

Salam ardelenesc

Carne de porc, slǎnină, sare, condimente, boia de ardei iute, boia de ardei dulce, dextroză, antioxidant: ascorbat de sodiu, pudră de sfeclă roşie, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; cultură starter

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fettine sottilissime tacchino or Salam ardelenesc?

Overall, Fettine sottilissime tacchino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fettine sottilissime tacchino has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fettine sottilissime tacchino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons