Feta traditionel vs Bedda in Salzlake kräuter-hirte
Overall, Feta traditionel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Feta traditionel | Bedda in Salzlake kräuter-hi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 267 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 19.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feta traditionel has 31% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 19.2 g).
- Feta traditionel has 35% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Feta traditionel has 93% more protein (20 g vs 1.5 g).
- Feta traditionel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Feta traditionel
Not available.
Bedda in Salzlake kräuter-hirte
Wasser, 22% Kokosöl, modifizierte Stärke ( kartoffel, tapioka), Meersalz, Kartoffelprotein, Olivenextrakt, Aroma, Citrusfaser, 0,1% Kräuter
FAQ
Which is healthier: Feta traditionel or Bedda in Salzlake kräuter-hirte?
Overall, Feta traditionel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bedda in Salzlake kräuter-hirte has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 267 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Feta traditionel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.