Feta traditionel vs Hirtenkäse
Overall, Feta traditionel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Feta traditionel | Hirtenkäse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 267 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feta traditionel has no sugar, while Hirtenkäse has 1 g.
- Feta traditionel has 39% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.7 g).
- Feta traditionel has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
- Feta traditionel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Hirtenkäse lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Feta traditionel
Not available.
Hirtenkäse
Kuhmilch, Salzlake
FAQ
Which is healthier: Feta traditionel or Hirtenkäse?
Overall, Feta traditionel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hirtenkäse has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 267 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Feta traditionel has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.