Comparison
Fave sgranate vs Habitas muy tiernas
Overall, Habitas muy tiernas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fave sgranate | Habitas muy tiernas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 6.5 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Habitas muy tiernas has 20% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Habitas muy tiernas has 23% more fiber (6.5 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Fave sgranate
Fave
Habitas muy tiernas
Habas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fave sgranate or Habitas muy tiernas?
Overall, Habitas muy tiernas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Habitas muy tiernas has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Habitas muy tiernas has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.