Comparison

Espinacas hamburguesa vs Hamburguesas de Pollo

Overall, Hamburguesas de Pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEspinacas hamburguesaHamburguesas de Pollo
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 178 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 11.3 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 3 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.5 g
Protein 13.5 g 15 g
Additives22
AllergensCelery, Milk, MustardMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hamburguesas de Pollo has 20% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 178 kcal).
  • Hamburguesas de Pollo has 19% less fat (9.2 g vs 11.3 g).
  • Hamburguesas de Pollo has 14% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Hamburguesas de Pollo has 10% more protein (15 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Only Espinacas hamburguesa lists: Celery, Mustard.

Ingredients

Espinacas hamburguesa

(ES) Hamburguesa de pollo y espinacas. Preparado de came. Ingrediertes: 70% carme de muslo de polo, 20% espinacas, fibra vegetal, almidón, aqua, sal, antioxidantes: lactato sódico, ascarpato sódico; corrector de acidez: acetatos de sodio; especias. Puede contener trazas de soja, huevo, sulfitos, leche y derivados läcteos, apio y mostaza.

Hamburguesas de Pollo

Carne de pollo (85%), agua, fibra y almidón de guisante, sal, especias, vinagre, antioxidantes (citratos de sodio, ascorbato sódico aroma natural y concentrado vegetal. Puede contener trazas de soja y proteína láctea.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Espinacas hamburguesa or Hamburguesas de Pollo?

Overall, Hamburguesas de Pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hamburguesas de Pollo has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Espinacas hamburguesa has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons