Espinacas en hojas vs Blattspinat Zwutschgerl
Overall, Espinacas en hojas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Espinacas en hojas | Blattspinat Zwutschgerl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Espinacas en hojas has 43% more fiber (3.7 g vs 2.1 g).
Ingredients
Espinacas en hojas
Espinaca.
Blattspinat Zwutschgerl
Blattspinat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Espinacas en hojas or Blattspinat Zwutschgerl?
Overall, Espinacas en hojas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Espinacas en hojas has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blattspinat Zwutschgerl has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.