Comparison
Entrecôte vs Sauvignon Blanc Reserva
Overall, Sauvignon Blanc Reserva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Entrecôte | Sauvignon Blanc Reserva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauvignon Blanc Reserva has 68% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Sauvignon Blanc Reserva lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Entrecôte
Rotwein
Sauvignon Blanc Reserva
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Entrecôte or Sauvignon Blanc Reserva?
Overall, Sauvignon Blanc Reserva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauvignon Blanc Reserva has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauvignon Blanc Reserva has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.