Comparison

Ensalada China Con. Mazorquitas vs Ensalada china

Overall, Ensalada china has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEnsalada China Con. Mazorqui...Ensalada china
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — —
Calories 33 kcal 32 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 4.3 g 2.4 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 0.6 g 1.8 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ensalada china has 44% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Ensalada china has 67% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Only Ensalada China Con. Mazorquitas lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Ensalada China Con. Mazorquitas

Hortalizas en proporción variable (brotes germinados de judía mungo, zanahoria, pimiento rojo (sulfitos), seta (Pleurotus ostreatus), mazorquitas (sulfitos) (2%)), vinagre de vino, azúcar y sal. Puede contener altramuz y mostaza. Producto pasteurizado. PProdutos hortícolas em proporções variáveis (rebentos de feijão mungo, cenoura, pimento vermelho (sulfitos), cogumelo (Pleurotus ostreatus), milho (sulfitos) (2%)), vinagre de vinho, açúcar e sal. Pode conter tremoço e mostarda. Produto pasteurizado. Líquido: Peso Neto/ 420 g Liquido Escorrido: Peso Neto Escurrido/ 235 ge gal las cuales d Cena Saturadas Saturat Badratos de los cuales Azúcares Acces Sura alimentara oteinas

Ensalada china

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ensalada China Con. Mazorquitas or Ensalada china?

Overall, Ensalada china has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ensalada china has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ensalada china has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons