Comparison

Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse vs Pechuga de pollo al corte

Overall, Pechuga de pollo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEmincés de Poulet - 100% Cui...Pechuga de pollo al corte
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 167 kcal 84 kcal
Fat 8.4 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 22 g 16.9 g
Additives15
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pollo al corte has 50% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 167 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pollo al corte has 86% less fat (1.2 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Pechuga de pollo al corte has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse has 38% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse has 23% more protein (22 g vs 16.9 g).
  • Pechuga de pollo al corte has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pechuga de pollo al corte lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse

Cuisse de poulet 83%, bouillons (eau, os de poulet, plantes aromatiques, ail, épices, sel), acidifiant : lactate de potassium, sel, fécule de manioc, dextrose de maïs.

Pechuga de pollo al corte

pechuga de pollo 70%, agua, sal, dextrosa, azúcar, proteína de soja, estabilizante E451i, estabilizante E407, especias, aromas, antioxidante E301, conservador E250,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse or Pechuga de pollo al corte?

Overall, Pechuga de pollo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pollo al corte has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Emincés de Poulet - 100% Cuisse has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons