Emince de poulet vs Cuisse de poulet
Overall, Cuisse de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Emince de poulet | Cuisse de poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 104 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuisse de poulet has 31% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 150 kcal).
- Cuisse de poulet has 82% less fat (1.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- Cuisse de poulet has 81% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Cuisse de poulet has no sugar, while Emince de poulet has 1.1 g.
- Cuisse de poulet has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Cuisse de poulet has 13% more protein (23 g vs 20 g).
- Cuisse de poulet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Emince de poulet lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Emince de poulet
Viande de cuisse de poulet (origine : France) - conservateurs : lactate de potassium, acétates de sodium - amidon transformé de manioc - LAIT demi-écrémé en poudre - sel - arômes (dont ŒUF) - sucre roux - épaississant : farine de graines de caroube - antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium - dextrose. 101 g de viande mis en œuvre pour 100 g de produit fini. Traces de céréales contenant du GLUTEN.
Cuisse de poulet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Emince de poulet or Cuisse de poulet?
Overall, Cuisse de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuisse de poulet has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuisse de poulet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.