Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm vs Truffes
Overall, Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm
Truffes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edle Matjesfilets nach nordi... | Truffes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 619 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 48 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 38 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has 71% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 619 kcal).
- Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has 73% less fat (13 g vs 48 g).
- Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has 92% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 38 g).
- Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has 95% less sugar (2 g vs 42 g).
- Truffes has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.7 g).
- Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has 70% more protein (13 g vs 3.9 g).
Ingredients
Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm
Not available.
Truffes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm or Truffes?
Overall, Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 619 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edle Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art mit Rapsölfilm has less sugar: 2 g versus 42 g per 100 g.