Edammer-edam vs Edam
Overall, Edam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edammer-edam | Edam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edam has 16% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 373 kcal).
- Edam has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 17 g).
- Edammer-edam has no sugar, while Edam has 4.6 g.
Ingredients
Edammer-edam
_Lait_ pasteurise de vache, sel, ferments l_actiques_, coagulant microbien. Lait origine Pays-Bas.
Edam
Leche pasteurizada de vaca, sal, cultivos microbianos (contienen leche), cuajo microbiano,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edammer-edam or Edam?
Overall, Edam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edam has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edammer-edam has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.