Edammer-edam vs Edam en tranches
Overall, Edam en tranches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edammer-edam | Edam en tranches |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edam en tranches has 14% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 373 kcal).
Ingredients
Edammer-edam
_Lait_ pasteurise de vache, sel, ferments l_actiques_, coagulant microbien. Lait origine Pays-Bas.
Edam en tranches
Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edammer-edam or Edam en tranches?
Overall, Edam en tranches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edam en tranches has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edammer-edam has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.