Edam sir vs Edammer-edam
Overall, Edam sir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edam sir | Edammer-edam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 312 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.9 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edam sir has 16% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 373 kcal).
Ingredients
Edam sir
_Lait_ pasteurisé, sel, ferments d'affinage, enzyme coagulante d’origine microbienne.
Edammer-edam
_Lait_ pasteurise de vache, sel, ferments l_actiques_, coagulant microbien. Lait origine Pays-Bas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edam sir or Edammer-edam?
Overall, Edam sir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edam sir has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edammer-edam has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.