Eau de kefir vs Oransoda
Overall, Eau de kefir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eau de kefir | Oransoda |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eau de kefir has 79% fewer calories (9 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Eau de kefir has 86% less sugar (1.4 g vs 10 g).
- Eau de kefir has the better Nutri-Score.
- Eau de kefir is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Eau de kefir
Eau filtrée, culture vivante de kefir de fruit, sucre le de canne*, jus de yuzu* (2%), jus de citron* agriculture biologique
Oransoda
Acqua minerale naturale "Fonti di Crodo-Lisiel", succo di arancia e succo di arancia da concentrato (20%), sciroppo di glucosio-fruttosio, zucchero, anidride carbonica, polpa di arancia (0,16%), acidificante: acido citrico, aromi naturali, conservante: sorbato di potassio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eau de kefir or Oransoda?
Overall, Eau de kefir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eau de kefir has fewer calories: 9 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eau de kefir has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 10 g per 100 g.