Comparison

Duchesses de patate douce vs Pommes Duchesse

Overall, Duchesses de patate douce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDuchesses de patate doucePommes Duchesse
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 174 kcal 215 kcal
Fat 11 g 11 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 1.2 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.7 g 2 g
Protein 2.6 g 2.1 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, NutsMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Duchesses de patate douce has 19% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 215 kcal).
  • Pommes Duchesse has 77% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Pommes Duchesse has 85% less sugar (0.8 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Duchesses de patate douce has 26% more fiber (2.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Duchesses de patate douce has 19% more protein (2.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Only Duchesses de patate douce lists: Eggs, Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Duchesses de patate douce

Patate douce (origine France) 51%, pomme de terre cuite (origine France) 21%, pomme de terre déshydratée (origine France) 7,4%, beurre (lait), eau, jaune d'œuf de poules élevées en plein air en poudre (oeufs), huile de tournesol, sel, curcuma, poivre blanc Présence éventuelle de céleri, gluten, fruits à coque

Pommes Duchesse

Pomme de terre 77,6%, huile de tournesol 10,8%, amidon de pomme de terre, pomme de terre déshydratée, sel, dextrose, noix de muscade, poivre blanc.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Duchesses de patate douce or Pommes Duchesse?

Overall, Duchesses de patate douce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Duchesses de patate douce has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pommes Duchesse has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons