Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie vs Natreen
Overall, Natreen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie
Natreen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Douwe Egberts Ice caramel la... | Natreen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Natreen has 93% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Natreen has no fat, while Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 1.3 g.
- Natreen has no saturated fat, while Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 0.9 g.
- Natreen has no sugar, while Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 7.3 g.
- Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 100% more protein (3.2 g vs 0 g).
- Natreen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie
Halfvolle melk (80%), koffiebereiding (6%) wackofenc suiker, maltodextrine, magere cacaopoeder, aroma, zuurteregelaars (E500, E39 wekkingsmiddel (E407), natuurlijk aroma
Natreen
INGREDI#NTEN: Zoetstoffen (natrium cyclamaat, natrium saccharinaat, sucralose), zuurteregelaars (natriumwaterstofcarbenaat,natriumcitraat), maltodextrine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie or Natreen?
Overall, Natreen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Natreen has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natreen has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.