Comparison

Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie vs Caffe Latte Macchiato

Overall, Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDouwe Egberts Ice caramel la...Caffe Latte Macchiato
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 58 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 4 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 2.4 g
Sugars 7.3 g 7.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 3.2 g 2.7 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 27% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 79 kcal).
  • Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 68% less fat (1.3 g vs 4 g).
  • Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 63% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has 16% more protein (3.2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Caffe Latte Macchiato is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie

Halfvolle melk (80%), koffiebereiding (6%) wackofenc suiker, maltodextrine, magere cacaopoeder, aroma, zuurteregelaars (E500, E39 wekkingsmiddel (E407), natuurlijk aroma

Caffe Latte Macchiato

Milch angereichert mit Rahm 80%, gebrühter Arabica-Kaffee* 17%, Zucker.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie or Caffe Latte Macchiato?

Overall, Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Douwe Egberts Ice caramel latte ijskoffie has less sugar: 7.3 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons