Comparison

STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es vs Natreen

Overall, Natreen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSTARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM...Natreen
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 43 kcal 4 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 4.6 g 0 g
Salt — 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.6 g 0 g
Additives21
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Natreen has 91% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 43 kcal).
  • Natreen has no fat, while STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es has 1.1 g.
  • Natreen has no sugar, while STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es has 4.6 g.
  • STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Only STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es

Haverbasis (water, haver (6,7%)) (75%) Starbuds Anbica ofe ter, kofie-extract) (20,9%), suiker (2.7%), koolzaadolie, magere cacaopoeder bisatoren (guarpitmeel, gellangom), natuurlijk aroma, zeemu uncabonaat, zoetstof (acesulfam-K) Wij zetten ons in om koffie 100% i weantwoord in te kopen in samenwerking met Conservation Internation 2024 Starbucks Corporation

Natreen

INGREDI#NTEN: Zoetstoffen (natrium cyclamaat, natrium saccharinaat, sucralose), zuurteregelaars (natriumwaterstofcarbenaat,natriumcitraat), maltodextrine.

FAQ

Which is healthier: STARBUCKS Oat CAPPUCCINO TM Chilled Coffee Bold es or Natreen?

Overall, Natreen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Natreen has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Natreen has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons