Comparison
Double Cream vs Nata para cocinar
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Double Cream | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 467 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 50.5 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.4 g | 12.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 60% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 467 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 64% less fat (18 g vs 50.5 g).
- Double Cream has 23% less saturated fat (9.4 g vs 12.2 g).
- Double Cream has 57% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.7 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 38% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Double Cream is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Double Cream
Pasteurised double cream, milk.
Nata para cocinar
light milk cream, natural starch, milk proteins,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Double Cream or Nata para cocinar?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Double Cream has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.