Double concentré de tomates vs Tomatenmark
Overall, Tomatenmark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Double concentré de tomates | Tomatenmark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 13.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomatenmark has 30% less fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Tomatenmark has 51% more fiber (4.7 g vs 2.3 g).
Ingredients
Double concentré de tomates
Purée de tomates double concentrée 100%.
Tomatenmark
Tomaten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Double concentré de tomates or Tomatenmark?
Overall, Tomatenmark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Double concentré de tomates has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomatenmark has less sugar: 13.5 g versus 14 g per 100 g.