Double concentré de tomate vs Tomatenmark
Overall, Tomatenmark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Double concentré de tomate | Tomatenmark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 13.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomatenmark has 23% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.6 g).
- Tomatenmark has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Double concentré de tomate
Purée de tomates* double concentrée à 28%, régulateur d'acidité : acide citrique. *Produits Issus de l'agriculture biologique
Tomatenmark
Tomaten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Double concentré de tomate or Tomatenmark?
Overall, Tomatenmark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Double concentré de tomate has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Double concentré de tomate has less sugar: 13 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.