Comparison

Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne vs Dorayaki Cake Matcha

Overall, Dorayaki Cake Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDorayaki haricots azuki et c...Dorayaki Cake Matcha
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 300 kcal 399 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 20.4 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0 g
Sugars 34.6 g 5 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.7 g
Protein 5.4 g 5 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne has 25% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 399 kcal).
  • Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne has 86% less fat (2.9 g vs 20.4 g).
  • Dorayaki Cake Matcha has no saturated fat, while Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne has 0.6 g.
  • Dorayaki Cake Matcha has 86% less sugar (5 g vs 34.6 g).
  • Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne has 54% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Dorayaki Cake Matcha has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne lists: Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne

Farine de BLE, Eau, Sucre cristallisé, Sucre, Haricots rouges, Sirop d'amidon (maïs, pomme de terre, patate douce), Châtaignes douces (4.2%), ŒUF entier séché (produit de USA), Huiles végétales (canola, SOJA), Agent levant (E500), Epaississant (E406). Allergènes: BLE, ŒUF, SOJA

Dorayaki Cake Matcha

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne or Dorayaki Cake Matcha?

Overall, Dorayaki Cake Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dorayaki haricots azuki et châtaigne has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dorayaki Cake Matcha has less sugar: 5 g versus 34.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons