Divine saveur vanille à l avoine vs Cashew pudding vanilla
Overall, Cashew pudding vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Divine saveur vanille à l av... | Cashew pudding vanilla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 98 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Soybeans, SOIJAproteiini |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Divine saveur vanille à l avoine has 53% less fat (2.6 g vs 5.5 g).
- Cashew pudding vanilla has 92% less sugar (0.6 g vs 7.6 g).
- Divine saveur vanille à l avoine has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Divine saveur vanille à l avoine has 35% more fiber (2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cashew pudding vanilla has 79% more protein (9.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Cashew pudding vanilla has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cashew pudding vanilla lists: Nuts, Soybeans, SOIJAproteiini.
Ingredients
Divine saveur vanille à l avoine
Not available.
Cashew pudding vanilla
Vesi, CASHEW (11%) (Vietnam), SOIJAproteiini, vaniljauute, stabilointiaineet (tapiokatärkkelys, johanneksenleipäpuujauhe), luontaiset aromit, merisuola, väri (beta-karoteeni), makeutusaineet (asesulfaami K, sukraloosi), vaniljansiemen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Divine saveur vanille à l avoine or Cashew pudding vanilla?
Overall, Cashew pudding vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Divine saveur vanille à l avoine has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew pudding vanilla has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.