Délice de canard vs Lot Mousse Canard
Overall, Délice de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Délice de canard | Lot Mousse Canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 395 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 39 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Délice de canard has 10% less fat (35 g vs 39 g).
- Délice de canard has 14% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Lot Mousse Canard has 31% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Délice de canard has 24% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Délice de canard has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Lot Mousse Canard has 10% more protein (10 g vs 9 g).
- Lot Mousse Canard is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Délice de canard
Foie maigre de canard 29%, gras de porc, eau, graisse de canard 9,6%, foie de poulet, crème (LAIT), saindoux, ŒUFS, fibres de chicorée, fécule de manioc, sel, sucre, amidon de riz, Cognac, poivre, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, colorants : lutéine et extrait de paprika, conservateur : nitrite de sodium,
Lot Mousse Canard
Canard* (68 %) (foie maigre de canard, graisse de canard), lait, jaune d'œuf, crème, Porto, sel de mer, sucre, épices. *Origine : France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Délice de canard or Lot Mousse Canard?
Overall, Délice de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Délice de canard has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lot Mousse Canard has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.