Dark brown soft sugar vs Sucre roux
Overall, Sucre roux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dark brown soft sugar | Sucre roux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 100 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dark brown soft sugar has no fat, while Sucre roux has 0.5 g.
- Sucre roux has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre roux has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Dark brown soft sugar
Cane sugar, cane molasses
Sucre roux
100% sucre roux de canne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dark brown soft sugar or Sucre roux?
Overall, Sucre roux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre roux has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre roux has less sugar: 95 g versus 100 g per 100 g.