Sucre roux vs Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar
Overall, Sucre roux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sucre roux
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre roux | Light Brown Soft Natural Unr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 99 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar has no fat, while Sucre roux has 0.5 g.
- Sucre roux has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Sucre roux has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre roux has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sucre roux
100% sucre roux de canne.
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar
Cane sugar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre roux or Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar?
Overall, Sucre roux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre roux has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre roux has less sugar: 95 g versus 99 g per 100 g.