Cucina all'italiana vs Panna 100% vegetale
Overall, Panna 100% vegetale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cucina all'italiana | Panna 100% vegetale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 6 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna 100% vegetale has 45% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 256 kcal).
- Panna 100% vegetale has 52% less fat (12 g vs 25 g).
- Panna 100% vegetale has 75% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 6.4 g).
- Cucina all'italiana has 31% more protein (2.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Cucina all'italiana lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Cucina all'italiana
Acqua, oli vegetali di girasole soia e palma (in proporzioni variabili), latticello e latte scremato in polvere, maltodestrine, emulsionanti (E472e, lecitina di soia, E471), addensanti (E412, E410), stabilizzante (E339ii).
Panna 100% vegetale
Estratto di soia (81%) (acqua, semi di soia 8,3%), olio di girasole, sciroppo di glucosio, amido modificato di tapioca, aromi, emulsionanti: mono - e digliceridi degli acidi grassi, sale, stabilizzanti: gomma di xanthan, gomma di guar, carragenina, antiossidante: estratto di tocoferoli.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cucina all'italiana or Panna 100% vegetale?
Overall, Panna 100% vegetale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna 100% vegetale has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna 100% vegetale has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 4 g per 100 g.