Comparison

Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge vs Luxury Fudge (Caramel)

Overall, Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrumbly Stem Ginger FudgeLuxury Fudge (Caramel)
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 436 kcal 476 kcal
Fat 13.4 g 20 g
Saturated fat 8.7 g 19 g
Sugars 69.7 g 61 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 1.2 g 2.1 g
Additives02
AllergensMilkMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has 33% less fat (13.4 g vs 20 g).
  • Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has 54% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 19 g).
  • Luxury Fudge (Caramel) has 12% less sugar (61 g vs 69.7 g).
  • Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has 66% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Luxury Fudge (Caramel) has 43% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Only Luxury Fudge (Caramel) lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge

Sugar, butter (15%) (milk, salt), sweetened condensed milk (milk, sugar), glucose syrup, golden syrup, crystallised stem ginger (5%) (stem ginger, sugar), flavouring

Luxury Fudge (Caramel)

Fudge med salt og karamell Ingredienser: Sukker*, glukosesirup, helt herdet kokosfett, SKUMMETMELKPULVER, 0,6 % salt, vann, fargestoff (E150d), naturlig karamellaroma, emulgator (E322 fra SOYA). Kan inneholde spor av egg, peanøtter, mandler og pistasjenøtter.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge or Luxury Fudge (Caramel)?

Overall, Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crumbly Stem Ginger Fudge has fewer calories: 436 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Luxury Fudge (Caramel) has less sugar: 61 g versus 69.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons