Crenvursti de porc vs Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia
Overall, Crenvursti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crenvursti de porc | Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 289 kcal | 409 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 35.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 14.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 21.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crenvursti de porc has 29% fewer calories (289 kcal vs 409 kcal).
- Crenvursti de porc has 26% less fat (26 g vs 35.2 g).
- Crenvursti de porc has 30% less saturated fat (10 g vs 14.2 g).
- Crenvursti de porc has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Crenvursti de porc has 42% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia has 45% more protein (21.7 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Crenvursti de porc
Not available.
Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia
Carne porc, carne vita, slanina, sare, sirop de glucoza, arome naturale, antioxidant (acid ascorbic), condimente si extracte de condimente, extract de sfecla rosie, usturoi, conservant (nitrit de sodiu), cultura starter.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crenvursti de porc or Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia?
Overall, Crenvursti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crenvursti de porc has fewer calories: 289 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crenvursti de porc has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.