Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia vs Fox Salam sandwich 100gr
Overall, Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia | Fox Salam sandwich 100gr |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 409 kcal | 263 kcal |
| Fat | 35.2 g | 20.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.2 g | 8.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 21.7 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has 36% fewer calories (263 kcal vs 409 kcal).
- Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has 41% less fat (20.7 g vs 35.2 g).
- Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has 42% less saturated fat (8.2 g vs 14.2 g).
- Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has 35% less salt (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia has 25% more protein (21.7 g vs 16.2 g).
Ingredients
Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia
Carne porc, carne vita, slanina, sare, sirop de glucoza, arome naturale, antioxidant (acid ascorbic), condimente si extracte de condimente, extract de sfecla rosie, usturoi, conservant (nitrit de sodiu), cultura starter.
Fox Salam sandwich 100gr
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cris-Tim Salam Sinaia or Fox Salam sandwich 100gr?
Overall, Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fox Salam sandwich 100gr has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.