Creatine Micronized Monohydrate vs Naked Mass Gainer
Overall, Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Creatine Micronized Monohydr... | Naked Mass Gainer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has no calories, while Naked Mass Gainer has 389 kcal.
- Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has no fat, while Naked Mass Gainer has 0.8 g.
- Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has no saturated fat, while Naked Mass Gainer has 0.3 g.
- Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has no sugar, while Naked Mass Gainer has 6.5 g.
- Naked Mass Gainer has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Naked Mass Gainer has 100% more protein (15.6 g vs 0 g).
- Only Naked Mass Gainer lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Creatine Micronized Monohydrate
Micronized Creatine Monohydrate
Naked Mass Gainer
Organic Tapioca Maltodextrin, Whey Protein Concentrate, Micellar Casein
FAQ
Which is healthier: Creatine Micronized Monohydrate or Naked Mass Gainer?
Overall, Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Creatine Micronized Monohydrate has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.