Comparison

Crackers con Sal vs Krit piscis

Overall, Crackers con Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrackers con SalKrit piscis
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 438 kcal 495 kcal
Fat 12.8 g 25 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 8 g
Sugars 2 g 7 g
Salt 1.8 g 2.5 g
Fiber 3 g 3 g
Protein 10 g 8 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, Sesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crackers con Sal has 12% fewer calories (438 kcal vs 495 kcal).
  • Crackers con Sal has 49% less fat (12.8 g vs 25 g).
  • Crackers con Sal has 53% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 8 g).
  • Crackers con Sal has 71% less sugar (2 g vs 7 g).
  • Crackers con Sal has 30% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Crackers con Sal has 20% more protein (10 g vs 8 g).
  • Crackers con Sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Crackers con Sal lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Crackers con Sal

de sésamo, mostarda. maltada. Pode conter vestígios de soja, ovos, sementes de sódio), levedura natural (trigo). farinha de cevada coco), sal 1,2%, regulador de acidez (hidrogenocarbonato P Farinha de trigo, óleos vegetais (girassol alto oleico, contener trazas de soja, huevo, sésamo, mostaza. levadura natural (trigo), harina de cebada malteada. Puede coco), sal 1,2%, corrector de acidez (bicarbonato sódico), e Harina de trigo, aceites vegetales (girasol alto oleico,

Krit piscis

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crackers con Sal or Krit piscis?

Overall, Crackers con Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crackers con Sal has fewer calories: 438 kcal versus 495 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crackers con Sal has less sugar: 2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons