Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi vs Krit piscis
Overall, Krit piscis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carrefour Crackers Salati Ro... | Krit piscis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 505 kcal | 495 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi has 65% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 8 g).
- Krit piscis has 20% less sugar (7 g vs 8.7 g).
- Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi has 20% less salt (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Krit piscis has 17% more fiber (3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Krit piscis has 19% more protein (8 g vs 6.5 g).
- Only Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi lists: Eggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi
Harina de trigo, aceite de girasol alto oleico 26% (antioxidantes: ésteres ácidos grasos de ácido ascorbico, extracto rico en tocoferoles), azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa,extracto de malta de cebada, sal 2%, gasificantes (carbonatos de sodio, carbonatos de amonio), corrector de acidez (fosfatos monocalcico), levadura, agente de tratamiento de la harina (metabisulfito sódico)
Krit piscis
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carrefour Crackers Salati Rotondi or Krit piscis?
Overall, Krit piscis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Krit piscis has fewer calories: 495 kcal versus 505 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Krit piscis has less sugar: 7 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.